« Önceki |

18/6/2007

What is a Health Maintenance Organization?

What is a Health Maintenance Organization?

State Health Education Specialist, University of Missouri Extension

Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) are only one of many types of managed care arrangements. However, it is one of the oldest forms of managed care. Some describe it as "pure" managed care. If the different types of managed care were placed along a continuum. Managed indemnity plans, which are very similar to conventional insurance, would be at one end. At the other end would be HMO's. As one moves toward the HMO end of the continuum, the organizations becomes more complex and have higher operating costs. However, more emphasis is placed on prevention and quality of care. There is also more opportunity to control health care costs in HMOs than in indemnity plans.

Individuals who join an HMO are considered members. Typically HMOs provide members with comprehensive health care. When someone joins an HMO, they select a primary care physician from the list provided by the HMO. That primary care physician coordinates all of that member's medical care. If care by a specialist is needed, the primary care physician will refer the member to a specialist who is usually also in the HMO network. In an HMO, physicians may be employees of the HMO or the HMO may contract with independent physicians to provide care. Members who go outside of the network to receive care (unless given prior approval) will probably pay all or most of the cost of that care out of their own pockets.

HMOs use a "capitated" financing system. Care is provided to each member of the plan for a fixed amount. Typically, an employer contracts with an HMO to provide care for its employees and pays this fixed charge. If you are part of a Medicare HMO, than Medicare pays the fee. Some HMOs also charge individuals a small $5 to $10 co-payment for each visit. If the HMO is efficient and keeps its members healthy, it will make a profit. If it has too many members who require costly sick care, its profits are smaller or it may lose money. Remember under a "capitated system", the HMO is paid a fixed amount per person rather than for each visit or by type of service.

18/6/2007

What kinds of HMO's are there?

What is an HMO?

HMO's are both insurers and health care providers. They accept responsibility for a specific set of health care benefits offered to customers and provide those benefits through a network of physicians and hospitals.

Many people today are using HMO's. According to a New York Times article (Freudenheim, M. "Health Care in the Era of Capitalism," New York Times, April 2, 1996), an estimated 58 million Americans are enrolled in HMO's, and another 81 million are enrolled in other types of managed care. A July 8, 1996 Reuter's article says that more than 4 million Medicare beneficiaries and 12 million Medicaid recipients are in HMO's and other managed-care plans.


What kinds of HMO's are there?

Staff model HMO's own and operate physician-staffed health centers that offer a broad range of medical care including laboratory, x-ray, vision, and pharmacy services.

Group practice HMO's contract with medical groups to provide health services to HMO members.

Independent Practice Associations (IPAs) are HMOs that contract with individual physicians.

How does Medicare provide services through HMO's?

HMO's that contract with Medicare are obliged to offer at least as much coverage as the traditional Medicare fee-for-service policy does. As an HMO member, you will probably be given the opportunity to choose a primary care physician. That physician will be in charge of your care, and will refer you to specialists if necessary.

How is Medicare HMO coverage better than Medicare fee-for-service coverage?

These are a number of possible benefits:

  • Preventative Care. Insurance companies generally pay for medical services only upon illness or injury. HMO's are supposed to provide medical services that prevent illness or injury, making medical care both higher in quality and cheaper in the long run. One example is physicals: HMO's often require that members undergo physicals; traditional Medicare fee-for-service usually refuses to pay for physicals.
  • Broader health coverage. HMO's sometimes offer more services and broader coverage than Medicare policies, even when those policies are supplemented with Medigap insurance. For instance, many HMO's provide dental and routine eye care.
  • HMO's require less paperwork than Medicare insurance.

How is Medicare HMO coverage worse than Medicare fee-for-service?

HMO members face a number of restrictions:

  • Members must live in the HMO service area.
  • Members must use a primary care physician who belongs to the HMO, and often will not be granted access to a specialist without this physician's recommendation.
  • Members may not be able to get their HMO's to provide them elective medical services, or may face delays for those services greater than under a traditional fee-for-service plan.

What is the debate over HMO's versus traditional fee-for-service all about?

You can probably see why industry, government organizations, and citizens might argue about the benefits and drawbacks of HMO's. During the past several years, this debate has grown quite heated. Critics of HMO's say that HMO's do not focus on preventative medicine as much as they should, and make large profits by restricting patient access to the services of medical specialists. HMO supporters counter that HMO's are focused on preventative medicine and do offer reasonable access to medical specialists.

One often-cited study (at least on the Internet) seems to indicate that fee-for-service (FFS) care is better than managed care for seniors. 2,235 chronically ill patients in Boston, Chicago and Los Angeles participated in a four-year study in which they reported they had worse physical outcomes when treated in HMO's than in FFS care.

HMO's and voices from industry, however, argue that the study is unreliable because participants rendered judgments on their own health. These critics said the study would have been more objective and accurate if physicians, and not participants, had reported the change in health.

Are there any organizations that rate the quality of HMO's?

Yes. The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) accredits HMO's and releases "report cards" on them. The accreditations and report cards take into consideration, among other things, the quality of doctor accreditations, the strength of prevent ion programs, the vigilance of quality management, and the satisfaction of HMO members with the service they receive. Because these consumer reports on HMO care have only recently begun, not all HMO's in the U.S. have been rated by NCQA. (See the bottom of this page for access to the NCQA Web site.)

Other sources of information on HMO quality include the California Department of Corporations (puts out a complaint data report and a list of California-licensed HMO's), the Health Care Financing Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and business and consumer groups.

What legal protections exist against HMO malpractice?

About 35 states have enacted legislation to protect consumers from HMO's. This legislation has included minimum requirements for access and quality of care to be provided. Some of the most aggressive HMO legislation is in New Jersey and Minnesota.

In California, the Department of Corporations is responsible for regulating HMO's. People with grievances against a California HMO should get in contact with the health division of the Department of Corporations to have their complaints addressed. (See the bottom of this page for access to their Web site.)

According to an article in the Chicago Tribune, however, even the most effective state legislation may not protect many Americans. Federal legislation prohibits states from regulating companies with 40 or more employees that are self-insuring.

What should I consider when joining an HMO?

The following HMO features should be kept in mind, according to the National Committee for Quality Assurance:

  • Coverage. Most plans cover similar benefits, but the differences are in the details. Look at areas like mental health, home care, or chiropractic care, or anything that is particularly important to you.
  • Choice. Is there a certain doctor you'd like to choose either for routine care or specialty care? Do you have a favorite hospital? Some plans might not include your preferences. If not, are the other choices acceptable to you? Some plans offer a "point-of-service" program that lets you get care from doctors or hospitals that are not part of the plan's network, but you'll pay more for it.
  • Convenience. You probably want a plan that has doctors located near your home or office. But for you, convenience might also mean that it's easy to get pre******ions filled, or that evening and weekend appointments are available.
  • Cost. You will pay all or part of the premium directly or through payroll deduction, and a visit fee, or co-payment, whenever you get care. If your coverage is through your employer, your benefits manager can tell you what your portion of the premium will be. If you are in a Medicare managed care plan, there may be no premium.

18/6/2007

Operation

In addition to using their contracts with providers for services at a lower price, HMOs hope to gain an advantage over traditional insurance plans by managing their patients' health care and reducing unnecessary services. To achieve this, most HMOs require members to select a primary care physician (PCP), a doctor who acts as a "gatekeeper" to medical services. PCPs are usually internists, pediatricians, family doctors, or general practitioners. In a typical HMO, most medical needs must first go through the PCP, who authorizes referrals to specialists or other doctors if deemed necessary. Emergency medical care does not require prior authorization from a PCP, and many plans allow women to select an OB/GYN in addition to a PCP, whom they may see without a referral. In some cases, a chronically ill patient may be allowed to select a specialist in the field of their illness as a PCP.

HMOs also manage care through utilization review. The amount of utilization is usually expressed as a number of visits or services or a dollar amount per member per month (PMPM). Utilization review is intended to identify providers providing an unusually high amount of services, in which case some services may not be medically necessary, or an unusually low amount of services, in which case patients may not be receiving appropriate care and are in danger of worsening a condition. HMOs often provide preventive care for a lower copayment or for free, in order to keep members from developing a preventable condition that would require a great deal of medical services. When HMOs were coming into existence, indemnity plans often did not cover preventive services, such as immunizations, well-baby checkups, mammograms, or physicals. It is this inclusion of services intended to maintain a member's health that gave the HMO its name. Some services, such as outpatient mental health care, are often provided on a limited basis, and more costly forms of care, diagnosis, or treatment may not be covered. Experimental treatments and elective services that are not medically necessary (such as elective plasti  surgery) are almost never covered.

Other methods for managing care are case management, in which patients with catastrophic cases are identified, or disease management, in which patients with certain chronic diseases like diabetes, asthma, or some forms of cancer are identified. In either case, the HMO takes a greater level of involvement in the patient's care, assigning a case manager to the patient or a group of patients to ensure that no two providers provide overlapping care, and to ensure that the patient is receiving appropriate treatment, so that the condition does not worsen beyond what can be helped.

HMOs often shift some financial risk to providers through a system called capitation, where certain providers (usually PCPs) receive a fixed payment per member per month and in return provide certain services for free. Under this arrangement, the provider does not have the incentive to provide unnecessary care, as he will not receive any additional payment for the care. Some plans offer a bonus to providers whose care meets a predetermined level of quality.

Some critics regard HMOs as monopolies that distort the market for health care.

13/6/2007

Cancer Drug May Elude Many Women Who Need It

Published: June 12, 2007
 

CHICAGO — The breast cancer drug Herceptin is considered the model for the future of medicine tailored to each individual. The drug is given only to the 20 percent of breast cancer patients whose tumors have a particular genetic characteristic.

But now, nearly a decade after the drug’s approval, evidence is emerging that the testing of the tumors can be highly inaccurate or that the wrong cutoff values are being used to determine who qualifies for treatment.

That could mean that as many as 40 percent of women with early breast cancer might benefit from the drug but are not getting it, some experts say. Yet other women may be paying for the drug and risking its side effects unnecessarily.

“This has major practice-changing potential,” Dr. James H. Doroshow of the National Cancer Institute said in a commentary after one presentation at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting here last week. But he added that the data were too preliminary to justify changing treatment patterns just yet.

Herceptin, also known as trastuzumab, works by blocking Her2, a protein that can spur growth of tumor cells. It is given only to women whose tumors have abundant amounts of the protein. There are two tests used to determine this. One looks at the amount of the protein on the surface of a sample of tumor cells. The other looks for extra copies of the gene that governs the production of Her2.

But two studies discussed at the oncology meeting found that patients who were considered Her2-negative even using both tests benefited from Herceptin.

Both studies reanalyzed tumor samples from earlier clinical trials showing that Herceptin, if used after a tumor is removed by surgery, cuts the risk of the cancer’s recurring by half. For a woman to have entered those trials, her tumor had to be classified as Her2-positive by a local clinical laboratory.

But scientists have now gone back and retested those preserved tumor samples and found that as many as 20 percent of them were actually Her2-negative. Yet the women with those tumors also experienced a reduction in cancer recurrence from Herceptin, in some cases as great as that in the Her2-positive women.

“This is a revolution compared to what we believed before,” said Dr. Edith A. Perez of the Mayo Clinic, who presented one of the studies. She said the findings raised questions of whether women who were Her2-negative should be tested again.

Some experts were skeptical, saying the number of patients in the two studies was too small to draw firm conclusions. Also, they said, it was not clear if those women were truly Her2-negative, since they had tested positive by the local laboratory.

Dr. Daniel F. Hayes, a breast cancer specialist at the University of Michigan who helped develop guidelines for Her2 testing, said it would be unwise to start giving Herceptin to Her2-negative women because the drug was expensive and raised the risk of heart failure.

But he said the studies called attention to the inconsistent quality of Her2 testing in many small laboratories. Laboratories can use commercially available tests or develop their own.

Dr. Soonmyung Paik, who presented the second study at the cancer conference, said the problem might lie not in sloppy testing but rather in the cutoff used to determine which women get Herceptin.

Dr. Paik, who is with the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, said that about 40 percent of women had intermediate levels of Her2. They are now classified as negative but might still derive some benefit from the drug. On the other hand, he said, many women who are Her2-positive do not benefit from Herceptin. So better ways are needed to determine who should be treated.

“To me, the take-home message is that we don’t have a perfect test, unfortunately,” Dr. Paik said.

Dr. Pamela M. Klein, an executive at Genentech, the manufacturer of Herceptin, said the company was continuing to explore how to best identify patients for the drug.

The fact that this uncertainty is occurring so long after the 1998 approval of Herceptin — the paragon of “personalized medicine” — suggests that it will not be so easy to tailor other drugs to patients based on gene or protein tests.

It left some doctors at the conference incredulous and uncertain how to treat their patients.

“Here we are, 10 years into it,” said Dr. Marc L. Citron, an oncologist in Lake Success, N.Y., “and we don’t know how to test for it.”

13/6/2007

When School Is Out, Getting Good Food In

Published: June 12, 2007
 
No one can dispute that American children are fatter than ever. Much of the blame has been placed on schools — lunch programs high in calories, snack and soda machines in the schools and curtailed or absent physical activities during the school day.
 

Although schools are hardly off the hook, a study published in April in The American Journal of Public Health, which tracked the physical condition of 5,000 children as they passed through kindergarten and first grade, found that the biggest gains in body mass index occurred in the summer when parents had sole responsibility for their children’s diets and exercise opportunities.

Summer is also an opportunity, an ideal time to start children on a wholesome nutritional track and to encourage enjoyable physical activities, some of which can be pursued even after school resumes next fall.

Promoting Produce

A simple and beautifully illustrated new book by Steve Charney and David Goldbeck, “The ABCs of Fruits and Vegetables and Beyond,” is one good way to interest youngsters in these most nutritious foods, which are readily available, and tastier, in the summer. Part 1 is a series of easy-reader alphabet poems about common and uncommon produce, from apples to zucchini and including (wild) xemenia for the “X” page.

Part 2 offers a host of enticing food facts, recipes and fun. A simple summer dinner might be zucchini with linguini, a recipe that includes scallions, sweet red pepper, tomatoes, fresh basil and parsley, and, of course, zucchini. Or you could bake Z’s Mystery Cake, with whole-wheat flour, low-fat yogurt, chocolate chips and shredded zucchini.

The goal is to familiarize children with foods that are good for them. In many cases, children can help with the preparation, which often encourages them to taste, if not fully consume, something new and different. With yard space, you might even try growing some of these foods. A friend who has done just that with the help of her very young daughters had no trouble getting them to eat all kinds of vegetables, even before they were cooked.

Another recently published aid for those parents who have had a hard time introducing their children to wholesome foods is “The Sneaky Chef: Simple Strategies for Hiding Healthy Foods in Kids’ Favorite Meals” by Missy Chase Lapine. The book includes simple make-ahead purées or clever replacements that can greatly improve the way children eat — not to mention the rest of the family.

Of course, unlike the ABC book, “The Sneaky Chef” does not introduce children to the wonderful foods that can help them grow up healthy and strong. But it is a way to get them to eat many of these foods, through recipes like spaghetti and meatballs with eight hidden vegetables, cauliflower masked in mac and cheese, and blueberries hidden in cupcakes.

I confess to using this technique with my own children decades ago. I made muffins and quick breads with puréed and shredded fruits and vegetables. I puréed vegetables in soup broth and left visible only the vegetables I knew they would eat. I shredded vegetables into meatloaf and pasta sauces, and I made blender drinks with a variety of fruits.

Feeding for a Healthy Weight

There are three factors to consider when trying to encourage children to eat enough of the good foods and not too much of those snacks and treats that tend to pile on the pounds without providing much in the way of nutrition.

Factor 1: Don’t make an issue of it. Children who are repeatedly told that they cannot eat this or that tend to want those foods in preference to others. A child in my neighborhood whose parents forbid him to eat candy secretly stockpiled it in a friend’s house and ate it there. It would have been better to give him a “candy allowance,” say a piece of chocolate once a day or a candy bar once a week. Now that we know that dark chocolate may actually be healthful, there is even a good choice.

Ice cream, too, can be a reasonable treat, especially in the hot summer. But select the reduced-fat brands or frozen yogurt. Check the label for calories per serving — it should not exceed 150 — and keep in mind that a serving is half a cup.

Frozen-fruit ices, which have no fat, are another good choice in hot weather. I worry far less about the sugar content than the amount of fat in a frozen dessert. Or consider making your own fruit ices with your child’s help. It’s easy, and you can buy popsicle molds and sticks to help matters along.




#1 Free Link Exchange Directory On The Web - Link Market
Have you ever tried to exchange links, swap links, or trade links? Was it hard? Use link market instead; - it is easy to use, free and very smart. It will save you hours of work.